Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

Windows Vista

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • So, which Windows users will be moving over to Vista in the next month then?

    (Some of you may already have an evaluation copy)

    Not sure if I’m going to bother. I haven’t used it properly yet but it looks like a lot of eye candy and no real improvements. Seems like a resource hog too.

    Mind you, that’s what almost everyone was saying about XP when it arrived.

    xp is condescending enough, i imagine vista will be worse and soak up more ram on frilly crap that slows down your computer. not buying into it unless its absolutely neccessary, which i cant see happening….[IMG]http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g39/usemal/nativebanner.swf[/IMG]

    USE wrote:
    xp is condescending enough, i imagine vista will be worse and soak up more ram on frilly crap that slows down your computer. not buying into it unless its absolutely neccessary, which i cant see happening….[IMG]http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g39/usemal/nativebanner.swf[/IMG]

    That’s the way I’m feeling really. Unless there is some kind of major benefit as opposed to the eye candy and novelty tricks then I think I’d prefer to spare system resources for other things.

    Have you seen this, USE?

    [yt]QmkQ1Nc9UYQ[/yt]

    Quality.

    Isn’t Direct X 10 going to be available for Vista only?

    I still use Win2K on one of my machines at home…. when that finally gets desupported I will put ubuntu on there…. (apparently ubuntu/linux is catching up with multimedia applications which was what was holding me back from using it)

    Most high tech kit is rushed to market, bugs and all, with the early adopters acting as unpaid beta testers …..

    XP was not IMO completed late 2003 – I suspect vista (already substantially delayed) will not be properly completed until 2009.

    At work all machines are staying on XP for the foreseeable future.

    That said I don’t think that these days MS are the sole villain with regard to “bloatware” and planned obsolesence; they are in cahoots with many hardware manufacturers to keep people upgrading their hardware…

    Dr Bunsen wrote:
    Isn’t Direct X 10 going to be available for Vista only?

    Really? Damn. Maybe I’ll have to use it on a partition then.

    *grumbles*

    [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3AwI1mKrLs[/media]

    transparent windows. auto picture preveiw. sideways windows. big frills. big whoop.

    Direct x10 shipped with vista wont be supported [or debugged properly for that matter] by the hardware for at least 6 months yet from a gaming point of view

    I think I am staying with xp – it and I have gotten used to each other and my camera software runs well on it. Plus its now fairly stable after so many patches and stuff.

    If xp were to become impractical I am heading to linux as vista is a huge system hog by all descriptions and is going to require lots of patches to get it up to standard [as MS operating systems always do when first shipped] and I am good at crashing computers at the best of times :groucho::groucho::groucho:

    When DX10 finally arrives and rentokill answer the usual plea for help with all the bugs that will appear from the cracks after it’s been used by real people for a bit…… Then I probably will have a look…

    DX10 is the only good reason for the upgrade. Should be interesting to see if Redmond give in to the pressure, and release DX10 for xp. They are claiming it’s an impossible job. Apparently the Hardware Abstraction Layer is below the driver layer in vista, as opposed to above in xp – basically means the HAL is directly responsible for the calls to the hardware, instead of manufacturers drivers. The manufacturers have to write drivers to a standardised code pattern, and the HAL then uses them to control the silicon. This allegedly makes it possible for them to do things with DX10 that can’t be done with the previous API structure, and will result in “the most stable windows ever”…:laugh_at::laugh_at::laugh_at:

    Get the feeling somehow that the term “impossible” they use here is replacing the term “a lot of work and money spent for no reason that makes sense to the beast of redmond”:wink:

    DX10 does look good though…. And DX is pretty much the only piece of code to come out of Microsoft that has been done consistently well (after DX 7 anyway)

    a freind in the IT industry reckons vista is pretty worthwhile and so far (apart from the voice recognition system!) seemingly faultless. altho only time will tell. and thats only from a networking/work point of view

    wont matter to me tho as im gonna buy an imac the second i can afford it.

    My home system runs windows 2000 and my work machine is xp with all the xp nicities turned off but I’m toying with installing raid 0 or 1 and going to xp…

    Raid is good stuff :weee: go for it

    I should know better than mess with a perfectly happy system though…

    :laugh_at::laugh_at::laugh_at:

    i’m gonna stick with XP.. not had many probs with it.. i know how to fix probs etc so its all good

    i think i’m gonna stick with XP or get an iMac laptop or summat. the new windows looks pretty unexciting and i dont like supporting the monopoly that is microsoft anyway.

0

Voices

19

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.