Emotion Rave in Perth Australia 1993 [google]3312783030420457973[/google]
[SIZE=-1]This is the first 30 minutes of a cool rave in 1993 in Perth Australia. Video footage was 101% amature. It starts of at the setup stage, cutting the grass as this is an outdoor event. Then the video kicks in at midnight and shows a few high lights.
This event was funded by a family member of the Pizza place called Toto's Pizza in Perth. Made a nice 100% profit too.
I also recognized a person I knew in high school in the video too at 18:00, a guy named Jason Brigs I think his name was, a bit of a big shot, but its really funny that he would have never have guessed that I would have been at these parties, let alone be the person that made the video projector screen video and know the Djs like Hutcho![/SIZE]
[google]-8576618798922652453[/google]
[SIZE=-1]Cool rave in Perth 1993, shot during 2am to 5am. Nice music, and scenes, very outdoorish and techy. I think at least 250 peoples faces are in this segment, so if you were there as a youngy or knew someone there, you might recognize them. Enjoy. Dj Greg aswell which I went to school with but he was an ACDC fan back then. Ahh little does he know about this video...[/SIZE]
[google]7866037136357270345[/google]
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=7866037136357270345&q=perth+rave
[SIZE=-1]More of this cool rave in Perth 1993 outdoors. Includes classic tracks such as "Sunshine on a rainy day - by Zoe", in 93, not 2003 like it was played on radio...
[/SIZE][google]3957276660419461323[/google]
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=3957276660419461323&q=perth+rave
[SIZE=-1]Cool rave in Perth 1993 outside, Dj Hutcho and Dj Jacen on the decks, and other people including me. lots of tired people now at 10am, time to go home![/SIZE]
the local rag again! :you_crazy
there's a 4-page thread with about 60 toddlers/young kids pictures on, and the purpose is so people can text/ring and vote for the one they like the look of best, and then they ar named the area's "cutest superkid"
anyone else think this is a bit... wrong? or odd at least.
Party this Sat – anyone up for it? in lancs
hardhouse & techno-type stuff
(hopefully no gabba) :wink:
anyone up for going (or want a lift from manchester?)
should be a good un
free parties im new to this forum and ive joined up because i ave somehow managed to get to a few free parties before on highdown hill but i didnt no they were going on lol. since these parties seem to be always on i wana try n get myself to as many as i can.
obviously all the legal ones (htid, transmission) are some of the best parties ever but u cant beat a wreck up with strangers in a feild:D
Old slide projector Just picked up an old plug in slide projector any one got any ideas how i can adapt it to project pcycadelic stuff onto back drops?
Is Britain’s rail infrastructure *really* that antiquated? OK I was travelling back from Lowestoft and just as I was on the train leaving the station,
I swear I saw the following..
an old guy standing in what I thought was a white signal box which had levers etc
some of those signals with arms that wave up and down like what you used to get for steam trains
that said I was absolutely trashed and was drifting in and out of sleep at that point, and I have recently been reading a lot of books and websites about Suffolk in the 1900s to 1940s.
Did I actually see any of that in 2007 or was it all a figment of my imagination?
Surely they don't still use all this stuff in the 21st century? (might explain the sketchy train service I suppose...)
Lighting…. Righty who knows there shit?
I have a bit of cash I want to spend on lights but I'm totally clueless as to what is worth the cash and what isn't
At the moment we only have one light for the rig and we want lots more.12
EU gives up on ‘metric Britain’
http://news.bbc.co.uk wrote:
The European Union is set to confirm it has abandoned what became one of its most unpopular policies among many people in Britain.
It is proposing to allow the UK to continue using pounds, miles and pints as units of measurement indefinitely. The European Commission will announce later it is leaving all future decisions to the British government. The decision is being seen as a victory for supporters of the ancient imperial system, the so-called "metric martyrs".
Pint saved
The UK had been due to set a date for phasing out all its imperial measurements within three years. This would have meant setting a deadline for ending the traditional delivery of pints of milk - and the sale of pints of beer in Britain's pubs.
Every one of Britain's road signs would have had to be changed from miles to kilometres - a move which opponents warned would be both expensive and confusing. But it was the move, begun in 2000, to make Britain's market traders sell their produce in kilograms rather than pounds and ounces which caused outrage among traditionalists.
Sunderland grocer Steve Thorburn inspired the "metric martyr" movement with his defiance of the order to abandon the imperial measurements. In 2001, his scales were confiscated and he earned a criminal conviction for selling a pound of bananas from his market stall.
He died unexpectedly from a heart attack three years ago, and while the campaign he founded failed to win traders the right to ignore metric weights altogether, it has brought some results.
The traders will continue to be allowed to show both metric and imperial prices for their goods.
'No problem'
Under the plans which have now been scrapped, even displaying the price of fruit and vegetables in pounds and ounces would have become grounds for a criminal prosecution. The decision to back down was made by Industry Commissioner Guenter Verheugen.
His role includes trying to improve the EU's reputation in member states - and in an interview with the BBC, he admitted the EU had been making itself unpopular on an issue that didn't really matter. "I organised a huge consultation, and the result was that industry told us there was no problem with the existing system.
"I want to bring to an end a bitter, bitter battle that has lasted for decades and which in my view is completely pointless. We're bringing this battle to an end."
'Extremely misleading'
However, campaigners on both sides of the debate have played down the significance of the announcement.
John Gardner, director of the pro-imperial British Weights and Measures Association, said: "I've seen the European Commission statement and what they're saying is it will be allowed to use imperial measurements as additional information. "We think that the European Commission statement is extremely misleading.
"From our point of view the situation hasn't changed and the campaign goes on. "If a trader tries to conduct his business in just imperial measurements that will be illegal."
'Business as usual'
The UK Metric Association said the statement does not mean that traders can go back to weighing and pricing in imperial measures, and it will be "business as usual".
Chairman Robin Paice said: "While we regret this proposal to prolong the current muddle of metric and imperial units, it will only delay but not stop the inevitable move toward all-metric shopping. "Many of the big supermarkets have already stopped giving obsolete imperial prices, and we expect this trend to continue. There is no question of going backwards."
Britain first mooted plans to convert to an all-metric system in 1965. That led to generations of schoolchildren being promised that they would be the last ones who would have to learn two different systems.
Wow, the EU have actually let us just get on with something!
ley line map i dont suppose anyone knows where i could find a map of ley lines - either on the net or books or something, more specifically a map of the uk, the only ones ive been able to find on the net are quite basic and just show a buch of lines heading to glastonbury... but then my googleing skills are pretty naff really... im looking for quite a detailed one and possibly one tracing negative ley lines... if theyve been able to map those that is.
im just interested to learn a bit more about them and i had someone tell me that a negative line runs through my area so i wanted to check out if this was true or not and see if i can make any connection with odd stuff going on at the moment...
Free Tree Three (free party Act#5) Lebanon
Hey Vibers,
This was the lastest free party that took place in North Lebanon last saturday. It was under a huge oak tree 700 years old.
Will post you the video as soon as I have it. It's just that it was sold to FRANCE24 TV station to air it throught Europe showing the world that the Middle East is not only about violence.(sadly it is) we just try to do what ever we can...:hopeless:
OB are twats!! Hi folks, did anyone go to a free party last nite that got shut down by the plod?
It was near swindon (i think) in the middle of nowhere and yet the plod still shut it down bout 3.30ish in morning!!!
anyone go to it?
9/11 Loose Change 2nd Edition A must see...
[google]7866929448192753501[/google]
"Loose Change 2nd Edition" is the follow-up to the most provocative 9/11 documentary on the market today. This film shows direct connection between the attacks of September 11, 2001 and the United States government. Evidence is derived from news footage, scientific fact, and most important, Americans who suffered through that tragic day.
http://www.loosechange911.com/
Overview
Loose Change is a documentary by Dylan Avery (director and narrator), Korey Rowe (producer) and Jason Bermas (webmaster and graphic designer), released through their company, Louder Than Words.
The documentary presents a rebuttal to the official version of events during the September 11, 2001 attacks and the 9/11 Commission Report. It alleges that the attacks were not the result of terrorism but a series of cleverly executed events carried out by the US government.
Released as two separate editions, the documentary has been the focus of much debate with many websites and individuals challenging the validity of claims made by it. Avery is currently developing a script for a feature film version titled Loose Change: The Movie, scheduled for release in 2006.
History
The idea for the project was coined by Avery in May 2002 after a conversation with actor James Gandolfini in which Gandolfini told Avery "If you want to be a successful director, you have to have something to say to the world". [1] Avery began writing a story in which he and his friends discover that the events of September 11, 2001 were not the result of terrorist attacks but rather, orchestrated by the US government.
Financial backing for the project came in April 2005 from producers such as Phil Jayhan of letsroll911.org [2]. Avery released the first edition of Loose Change with an initial press of 1,000 DVDs. Rowe, a former soldier who served in Afghanistan and Iraq joined the project in June 2005. Bermas also joined the team and together they released an updated second edition in November 2005.
The documentary is available for purchase and distribution through its official website [3]. It can also be viewed online and downloaded through Google Video.
The documentary has been released in two editions. The first was released in April 2005 with the second released in November 2005. The second edition is a remake of the original with added footage and information.
Content
Timeline
Includes background information of a plan put forward in the days of the Cuban Missile Crisis then outlines significant events leading up to September 11, 2001.
Pentagon
Alleges that based on the evidence, or lack of, American Airlines Flight 77 could not have possibly crashed into the Pentagon and that damage sustained to the building may have been caused by a cruise missile or a smaller military aircraft.
World Trade Center
Suggests that the actual collapses of the World Trade Centers 1, 2 and 7 were not triggered by the plane crashes but by a series of explosions within the buildings that were detonated shortly before each building collapsed.
Flight 93
Suggests that United Airlines Flight 93 did not crash in rural Shanksville, Pennsylvania but actually landed safely at Cleveland Hopkins Airport where it was evacuated by government personnel into an unused NASA research center.
Oddities
Asserts that the technology to make cellular phone calls from airplanes was not invented until 2004.
Suggests that cell phone calls from passengers and crew were faked by the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico using sophisticated voice-morphing technology and that the December 13, 2001 video of Osama Bin Laden admitting guilt was also faked.
Asserts that of the list of hijackers initially released by the government, many were not in the planes and are still alive today.
Cui Bono
Outlines possible motives for the attacks.
Factual inaccuracies
The film states that New York's Empire State Building was hit by a B-52 in 1945. It was actually a B-25 Mitchell, an aircraft less than one-third the size of a B-52. The authors have since apologized and acknowledged this error.
Dylan Avery claims that the motors belonging to the plane that crashed into the Pentagon, made of steel and titanium alloys, could not have melted, because the burning temperature of kerosene in even a pure oxyen environment is below the melting point of titanium. Critics contend the melting point of titanium is irrelevant since the motors involve steel-titanium alloy rather than pure titanium, although Ti alloys melt at temperatures (1668 C)[1] significantly closer to titanium (1725 C) than to steel (1500 C).
The movie cites a study in which cell phone calls could not be made at 32,000 ft, it is assumed flight 93 was flying that high. In fact it was much lower on radar.
The movie cites Loizeaux, a demolition expert, and suggests he thinks the building was blown up with bombs and not from jet fuel, the movie does not continue to quote Loizeaux from the same article on the screen and mention he thinks it was from "jet fuel." The jet fuel would have caused molten steel to fall to the bottom of the elevator shafts from the heat of burning fuel by melting the steel building, the movie suggests that it is somehow a factor in blowing up the building.
The movie focuses on the Pentagon not being significantly damaged, but earlier mentions in the film itself that the building was protected specifically and structurally from this kind of attack. It makes sense then that the building would act like a bunker, not like a typical building when hit by a plane.
The film suggests that a plane hitting just a light pole would crash. It suggests a Gulfstream II headed to Houston crashed because it hit a light pole, in fact the Gulfstream II jet crashed and a TV reporter noted it had clipped a light pole before crashing, the film suggests the pole ripped the wing off. The film states 5 light posts were knocked over Flight 77, in fact light poles are designed to detach from few simple bolts, on impact from car crashes to save lives. The effect of hitting a light post by a plane's wing would not cause it to crash.
The official website contains a statement saying not to take anything the documentary says at face value and encourages viewers to personally research information on 9/11 and to form their own opinions.
Criticisms
Loose Change has been criticized as disinformation even by some within the 9/11 Truth Movement, which disagrees with many aspects of the official version of events on 9/11/01 [2]. A primary concern of many in the movement is the promotion by documentaries such as Loose Change and In Plane Site, that a commercial jet did not hit the Pentagon [3], [4], [5], [6].
Critics of the documentary's proposal that a cruise missile or a small aircraft may have been the cause of damage to the Pentagon, cite the nearly 100 documented accounts from witnesses on the scene[7] who reported seeing a large airliner. Some witnesses specifically noted seeing a 757, while only two witnesses, located some distance from the scene, reported seeing a small plane. Loose Change, however, implies that an equal number of witnesses reported different aircraft as reported a commercial jet, and does not mention the large body of witness reports in support of a commercial jet. Critics of the missile theory note that not a single witness at the scene has ever reported seeing a missile[8].
Many do not support the suggestion put forth (weasel words) by Loose Change that Flight 93 landed in Cleveland instead of crashing or being shot down in Pennsylvania, and that passengers were subsequently secretly evacuated to an empty NASA research center. The 9/11 Truth Movement reference needed note that there is virtually no evidence to support this claim weasel words and that many witnesses at the time reported seeing and hearing the plane at the crash site.[9], [10].
Wikipedia was used as a source for some information from the documentary. It has been argued that since Wikipedia can be publicly and anonymously edited, the producers of the documentary could have edited articles to suit their own purposes. None of the Wikipedia-based information has yet been verified as correct or incorrect.
The film carries many of the features of a Conspiracy Theory. Most notably, it appeals to common sense, letting the spectator draw some of the conclusions himself to make its claims more convincing. Regarding for example the events at the Pentagon, Dylan Avery shows a piece of the plane's fuselage on the lawn, and says: "And why is not singed, or scratched, after a 530 mph impact, and the subsequent fireball?", without trying to explain why it should be. He also claims that another part found on the site could not have come from a 757: "Let's look a little closer at the defuser case of a 757. Do you see the triangular bezels around the openings ? Those are nowhere to be found on the case found at the Pentagon". Rather than relying on an expert, it puts the spectator in the expert's seat.12
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.
