Free party @ The Sanctuary Birmingham Inukshuk will be taking over the whole of the Sanctuary on 14th February for a Valentines day free party. Yes free!
We will have 6 rooms open with Techno, Hard House, Breakbeat, Trance Funk & Hi NRG, Deep House and Dub.
We will also be installing a state of the art sound system into the Dance Factory.
Main Room Techno (Cohesion)
Aaron Liberator (Stay up Forever Records)
Cyber Steve (Coh.uk.recs, Snap n Crackle Records)
Twatted Matt (Coh.uk.recs)
Duncan Disorderley (Atomic Jam)
Jester, Herne & Carobus (Hanky Panky)
Dance Factory Hard House (Shaft)
Mick Cree (Etrax, Dynamic Intervention)
ColTheMedik (Crunch)
Strange Dave (Sundissential, Afterssential)
Tony De Leon (Tidy Trax)
Temple Bar Breakbeat (Insurrection)
Haze (Freakaboom, Backroom Records, Breaks FM)
Brothers Bud (Atomic Jam)
Creed (Intregrale Muzique)
Naked Electric DJ's (MBN Records)
Jim The Grin
Trance Funk & Hi NRG (Trance Orbital)
Juno, Elrick, Jarrah & Mark Sinclair (Pendragon)
Kim Chi, Digital Pimp & Trance Punk
Pierre Knott B2B Shm (Intergrate)
Deep House (Funked Up)
Paul the Hat, Jester, Herne, Shroom
Dub (Jibbering Records)
Rafiki, Dj Day, Juggla, Solar, DJ TBC
If you didn't go to the last one, don't miss out on this one.
big up ya dissident crew have eventually found my way to the dissident forum...where is everybody?
this is just to say keep doin what you're doin & the bristol scene & partygoers will be much better off for it.
laters,
punksi
smokescreen &babble if anyones interested in babble and smokeys allnighter, please check calendar for the 28th february, for all the details cheers debs.
Recoverworld @ The Fridge15 February 2003 ANTIWORLD & RECOVER RECORDS PRESENT:
RECOVERWORLD
“THE RECORDING”
Saturday 15 February 2003:
@ The Brixton Fridge!”!”!
10.00 – 06.00 AM
1 Town Hall Parade Brixton – SW9 London
RECOVERWORLD MAIN AUDITORIUM:
Raymondo
-Fevah-Pickle-
Jon Rundell
-Retek Records-Recoverworld-
Superfast Oz
-Banging Tunes-
Orpheus – 2 (Live)!”!”!
www.antiworld.net
Dj Peace Vs Fabry
-Antiworld-Recoverworld-Psygate-
K-90 (Live)!”!”!
-www.recoverworld.com
Simon Eve
-Superfish-Recoverworld-
Bk
-Nukleuz-
Signum
-Recoverworld-Holland-!”!”!
SATURDAY 15 FEBRUARY 2003
BLAST OFF: 10.00 PM
RE-ENTRY: 06.00 AM
@ The Brixton Fridge!”!”!
1 Town Hall Parade
Brixton – SW9
London
Nearest tube: Brixton
Victoria Line!”!”!
PLEASE NOTE:
FROM THE NEXT RECOVERWORLD THE FREE GUEST LIST WILL CLOSE ONE DAY BEFORE THE EVENT SO PLEASE CALL/EMAIL ANASTASIA
(anastasia@antiworld.net 0044 (0) 7775 88 21 36)
TO MAKE SURE YOUR NAME IS IN THERE & YOU HAVE YOUR NUMBER..
PEOPLE CALLING FOR FREE GUEST LIST ON THE DAY OF THE SHOW WILL GO IN OUR PAYING GUEST LIST …
PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY AS IT WILL APPLY TO EVERYONE…
DJS…LIVE ACTS…PERFORMERS…CREW…STALLS…AND REGULARS!!
Only 200 Advanced tickets on Sale @ £ 10+ b/f from :
www.therecordbox.com
0207 733 22 80
plus more tickets @ £ 15 + b/f from:
www.accessallareas.org
0207 267 83 20
www.antiworld.net
0208 365 89 18
www.recoverworld.com
www.clubtickets.co.uk
0845 602 34 06
GROUP DISCOUNT WELCOME:
BUY 10 TICKETS AND GET 1 FREE!”!”!
More Shops @ £ 15 + b/f:
Cyberdog (Camden Town): 0207 482 28 42
Cyberdog (Covent Garden): 0207 836 78 55
www.harderfaster.net www.gurn.net
Contacts:
E-303: 0044 (0) 7940 527 867
Antiworld : 0044 (0) 208 365 89 18 (Tel&Fax)
Anastasia : 0044 (0) 7775 88 21 36 (Guest List & Concessions)
www.fridge.co.uk
0207 326 51 00
www.antiworld.net
info@antiworld.net
anastasia@antiworld.net
(Guest List & Concessions)
Forthcoming:
Fevah Vs Recoverworld
@ Heaven
Friday 07 March 2003:
Line Up: K-90 (Live)!!!
And all the Residents…
www.recoverworld.com
NEW:
“Teknoworld”
Techno – Funky – Hard!!!
@ The Fridge
Saturday 15 March 2003
Line Up: Space Djz 3 Decks
D.a.v.e The Drummer 3 Decks
& Chris Liberator (Resident)!”!”!
Next Psygate:
The First Birthday Show
“Psygate Meets Elsewhere”
Saturday 22 March 2003
@ Massive Underground Venue T.b.c…(Surprise)
Special Guest :
TALAMASCA (LIVE ON STAGE) – 3 DVISION – FRANCE!!!
Paul Taylor (Resident & Spun Records Ibiza – Spain)
Next Antiworld:
Saturday 12 April 2003:
The Antiworld Third Birthday!!!
Special Guests: Nick Sentience (Nukleuz – Uk)
The Smashing Guys (Live – Italy – Wicked Records)
Hypertraxx (Live – Germany – Overdose Records)
PEACE & LOVE
THE ANTIWORLD & PSYGATE CREW!”!”!
Antiwolrd @ The Fridge Sat 08 Feb 2003 ANTIWORLD PRESENT:
“THE LINE UP”:
Saturday 08 February 2003:
@ The Brixton Fridge!”!”!
10.00 – 06.00 AM
1 Town Hall Parade
Brixton – SW9
London
THE ANTIWORLD THEATRE :
Hi Nrg, Atmospheric & Hard Trance!!!
E-303 Vs Fabry
(Antiworld-Psygate-Recoverworld)
Mark Sinclair
(Pendragon)
WAVESTORM (LIVE ON STAGE)!”!”!
www.pablogargano.com
Andy Farley
(Frantic – Nukleuz)
Y.O.M.C (LIVE ON STAGE)!”!”!
GERMANY – OVERDOSE RECORDS
www.yomc.de
www.overdose.de
Beamish
(Antiworld – Mesh Records)!”!”!
SECOND ROOM
THE TECHNO & PSYTRANCE ZONE:
GREG & DAVE ARC – I
JODHA
GAS VS MIKELANGELO
PAT.TRIX VS ANIMATEK
PEACE
SEXSTASY VS GREEN VAPOR
SATURDAY 08 FEBRUARY 2003
BLAST OFF: 10.00 PM
RE-ENTRY: 06.00 AM
@ The Brixton Fridge!”!”!
1 Town Hall Parade
Brixton – SW9
London
Nearest tube: Brixton
Victoria Line!”!”!
PLEASE NOTE:
FROM THE NEXT ANTIWORLD THE FREE GUEST LIST WILL CLOSE ONE DAY BEFORE THE EVENT SO PLEASE CALL/EMAIL ANASTASIA
(anastasia@antiworld.net 0044 (0) 7775 88 21 36)
TO MAKE SURE YOUR NAME IS IN THERE & YOU HAVE YOUR NUMBER..
PEOPLE CALLING FOR FREE GUEST LIST ON THE DAY OF THE SHOW WILL GO IN OUR PAYING GUEST LIST …
PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY AS IT WILL APPLY TO EVERYONE…
DJS…LIVE ACTS…PERFORMERS…CREW…STALLS…AND REGULARS!!
Only 200 Advanced tickets on Sale @ £ 10+ b/f from :
www.therecordbox.com
0207 733 22 80
plus more tickets @ £ 15 + b/f from:
www.accessallareas.org
0207 267 83 20
www.antiworld.net
0208 365 89 18
www.recoverworld.com
www.clubtickets.co.uk
0845 602 34 06
GROUP DISCOUNT WELCOME:
BUY 10 TICKETS AND GET 1 FREE!”!”!
More Shops @ £ 15 + b/f:
Cyberdog (Camden Town): 0207 482 28 42
Cyberdog (Covent Garden): 0207 836 78 55
www.harderfaster.net www.gurn.net
www.epidemik.com
Contacts:
E-303: 0044 (0) 7940 527 867
Antiworld : 0044 (0) 208 365 89 18 (Tel&Fax)
Anastasia : 0044 (0) 7775 88 21 36 (Guest List & Concessions)
www.fridge.co.uk
0207 326 51 00
www.antiworld.net
info@antiworld.net
anastasia@antiworld.net
(Guest List & Concessions)
Forthcoming:
Saturday 15 February
Recoverworld
The Recordings
@ The Fridge!”!”!”!
Line Up:
K-90 Vs Orpheus 2 (Live On Stage)
Bk (Nukleuz)
Signum(Holland)!!!
www.recoverworld.com
NEW:
“Teknoworld”
Urban Music At Its Finest
Techno – Funky – Hard!!!
@ The Fridge
Saturday 15 March 2003
Line Up: Space Djz 3 Decks
D.a.v.e The Drummer 3 Decks
& Chris Liberator (Resident)!”!”!
www.antiworld.net
Next Psygate:
The First Birthday Show
“Psygate Meets Elsewhere”
in collaboration with Antiworld:
The Indoor Festival
Wall To Wall Worldwide Djs & Live Acts:
Saturday 22 March 2003
@ Mayfair Club Vauxhall
NEW MASSIVE UNDERGROUND VENUE
Zone One Victoria Line :
Special Guest :
TALAMASCA (LIVE ON STAGE) – 3 DVISION – FRANCE!!!
Dj Boxer From DARK SOHO Israel (Dj Set) Alchemy Records
Antiword Arena:
Back To The Underground
Nuw Idol (Live) + Residents
www.psygate.co.uk
Next Antiworld:
Saturday 12 April 2003:
The Antiworld Third Birthday!!!
Special Guests: Nick Sentience (Nukleuz – Uk)
The Smashing Guys (Live – Italy – Wicked Records)
Hypertraxx (Live – Germany – Overdose Records)
PEACE & LOVE
THE ANTIWORLD & PSYGATE CREW!”!”!
crawlin’ underground Well then, Saturday night was nothing short of a stroke of genius. Just how the hell did you get so much grade A extreme talent into one night?
I couldn't find a set list in the Nail room, so can anyone tell me who played that tasty set in there from 2-3?
My only complaint (aside from the bar/cloakroom prices but that's just because I'm not from London) is that it's a one off.
Nasty piece of work, guys and girls, for which I thank you.
has anyone used gb_ online? Has anybody used gbl online? I wired some money and have yet to get any tracking info and they have not replyed to my e-mails since picking up money, And i hope I didn't get burned. Any help with a legit source is desperately needed. Aloha
Disinformation Agents In Net Groups DISINFORMATION AGENTS IN NET GROUPS
Remember that George Bush Senior said within a few
hours of the attacks of 11th September 2001, that the
Internet was dangerous and needed to be limited and
monitored.
But they can't do that, because if they harass the Internet
any more than they are doing, 100s of MILLIONS of people
are going to know that there really are dictators in charge
of this planet. So they have to keep as secret as possible.
However, what is to stop them putting two or three agents
in every group that covers the truth on 9-11 and the Daft
War On Terror, and also Chemtrails? Nothing. Only us.
I see a lot of groups getting nowhere fast... because
some people keep posting trivial stuff - or - when someone
is calling for ACTION, a few people start a philosophical
debate on that action, or some other diversion which
then seems to sideline the whole group into nowhere land.
Yes?
We really are in the smelly stuff.
This isn't the time to mess around.
DIVERSION...... DIVERSION...... DIVERSION
As soon as someone gets a good plan going, or is
working on some important information, along will
come an egg-head, and change the subject.
PEOPLE: If you want to get out of this mess
you gotta start speaking UP.
Or these one or two egg-heads will lead the whole
group off course. Yes?
YES. You've noticed it. And so have I.
I am not talking about useful conversation and good
fact-finding, but people who seem like they have
totally lost the plot.
Your choice. Endless soap-opera conversation or
planning and action for survival - AND - making the
world a MUCH better place. But, SURVIVAL first.
[If you've got a good group going, just ignore this.]
SPEAK UP PEOPLE.
Just keep an eye out for them - and don't let
them keep putting us back to square one.
If you feel diversion is going on, speak UP.
Or, just join in and support the action.
Michael
World-Action, British Isles
http://www.world-action.co.uk
Leading Conservative MP Opposes War Even If Weapons Discovered in IRAQ IRAQ NOT A 'SERIOUS AND IMMINENT THREAT'
SAYS TORY
A leading Conservative MP has reiterated his
opposition to war on Iraq even if weapons of mass
destruction discovered. Douglas Hogg says the
'majority' of Conservative MPs have 'very serious
reservations' about the planned war.
1) Partial transcript of interview with Douglas Hogg
MP on Radio 4 Sunday 12 January 2003.
2) Transcript of speech by Douglas Hogg MP in the
House of Commons, 24 September 2002.
INTRODUCTION
Douglas Hogg, Conservative MP, a former Cabinet
Minister under John Major, a Privy Councillor, and a
leading lawyer - a Queen's Counsel, or 'QC' - opposes
war on Iraq even if it is established that Iraq possesses
weapons of mass destruction.
In January 1991, during the first Gulf War against
Iraq, Mr Hogg was a British Foreign Minister with
responsibility for Middle East policy - on one occasion
answering questions regarding the war in the House
of Commons on behalf of the Foreign Secretary.
(Please note that Mr Hogg offers the argument that
the war could be justified if there was a threat to
Britain's "interests". This is not a position recognised
in the UN Charter or in international law more
generally.)
1) Partial transcript of interview with Douglas Hogg
MP on Radio 4, The World This Weekend, Sunday 12
January 2003. Interview conducted by James Cox.
Radio 4: 'Mr Duncan Smith [Conservative leader] is
not supported by all of his backbenchers. The senior
Conservative and former Foreign Office minister
Douglas Hogg has expressed and repeated his doubts
about the moral and strategic justification for war
against Iraq. I asked him how many of his Tory
colleagues agree with him.'
Douglas Hogg: 'Very difficult to say, but I would have
thought the majority have very serious reservations.'
Radio 4: 'The majority?'
Douglas Hogg: 'Yes.'
Radio 4: 'When Parliament was recalled last
September the 24th, you made a significant speech in
which you said, and I quote in part, "Facing the facts as
they are known to the House today, I have come to
the conclusion that war is not justified." The facts have
not in your view changed, and your view has not
changed?'
Douglas Hogg: 'Not at all. You see the real problem is
this, it seems to me, that if you're going to go to war,
you've got to identify a good moral basis for war. That
has to be the case or you're not justified in going to
war. The only moral basis that exists in the modern
world is self-defence. Now you can give self-defence
an enlarged meaning, but ultimately it has to be a
serious and imminent threat to yourself, your allies or
your interests. And I do not myself believe Saddam
Hussein poses a serious and imminent threat to those
interests, and therefore I don't think self-defence
runs, and therefore there is no moral basis for war.'
Radio 4: 'You instanced a number of cases where you
thought there had been that evidence: Pearl Harbour,
the Falklands, the whole of the Second World War,
and the last Gulf War - when you were a Foreign
Minister of course.'
Douglas Hogg: 'Indeed, absolutely.'
Radio 4: 'The real problem, it seems to me, is the
interpretation of the weapons inspectors' assessment.
Dr Blix has said there is no "smoking gun". On the
other hand he says there are difficulties, there are
gaps between what Iraq has admitted and what it may
have. American and indeed British intelligence say,
"We know he has these things. If the weapons
inspectors can't find them, well that's because they're
not being very efficient." At that point, who do you
believe?'
Douglas Hogg: 'I don't know whether I have to believe
either of them. I'm perfectly prepared to assume that
Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction or
alternatively is capable of making them. But that surely
is not actually the direct question. The real question is
not whether he's got weapons of mass destruction,
but rather whether - if he has got those weapons - he
is a grave and imminent threat to the rest of us. Now,
there are lots of other countries in the world that do
have weapons of mass destruction, or are likely to
acquire them, but we don't necessarily conclude that
they are a grave and imminent threat sufficient to
justify war. So even if he had these things and I'm
perfectly prepared to assume that he's got them for
the purposes of this discussion, unless he's a grave and
imminent threat there isn't a moral basis for war,
because the doctrine of self-defence isn't properly
invoked.'
Web address for Radio 4 The World This Weekend
(requires RealAudio):
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/news/worldthisweekend/
2) Transcript of speech by Douglas Hogg MP in the
House of Commons, 24 September 2002.
House of Commons Debates (Hansard) 24 September
2002 : Column 49
Mr. Douglas Hogg (Sleaford and North Hykeham): As
my right hon. Friend the Member for Devizes (Mr.
Ancram) said, the central question that the House has
to face is whether we are prepared to authorise war
or a course of action likely to lead to war. I recognise
that we can only make a judgment on the facts as they
are known today. Those facts may change, and if they
do, as individuals we must be ready to change our
conclusions.
Facing the facts as they are known to the House today,
I have come to the conclusion that war is not justified.
My principal conclusion and the reason for that
conclusion is that I do not think the threat we face is
either sufficiently grave or sufficiently imminent to
provide the moral basis for war. I shall develop that
argument in a moment, but first let me say that I
believe there are a number of practical, military,
political and diplomatic objections to war, many of
which were touched on by my right hon. Friend the
Member for Devizes in the questions that he posed.
I would like to illustrate the nature of those problems
by raising a number of questions which I do not
purport to answer today. First, what is the military
strategy, how many troops will be engaged, where are
the bases and what are the military risks? Secondly,
will the Arab states rally behind the purpose and
provide bases for a coalition? Thirdly, what will Prime
Minister Sharon do if Iraq attacks Israel? Fourthly,
would Iraq survive as a unitary state, and if it seemed
likely that Iraq would collapse, what would be the
impact on regional stability in the middle east? How
long would coalition forces have to remain in Iraq
after an attack and, perhaps most profound
24 Sept 2002 : Column 50
of all, what is the likely impact on middle eastern
opinion or perhaps on our wider relationship with the
Islamic world if we commit ourselves to war?
I do not know the answers to those questions, but the
probable answer to most of them raises a powerful
case against war which only the most powerful
arguments in a contrary sense would surely displace.
My real objection to war is a moral one. I do not
believe now, looking at the evidence that we have, that
there exists a moral justification for war and I do not
wish to sanction a range of policies likely to lead to
that event.
I am not a pacifist. I am a strong supporter of
American engagement in world defence. I accept too
that war, even pre-emptive war, can be justified.
Proportionate self-defence accords with one's notions
of international and national law, personal morality,
and indeed, common sense.
For obvious reasons, I have to concede that at the
time of the last Gulf war I was the Foreign Office
Minister of State immediately responsible for
departmental decisions concerning the middle east. In
that capacity, I supported and participated in decisions
that resulted in war. However, we must always keep
in mind how terrible war can be. We have been
extremely lucky in the conflicts of the past 20 years. In
the Falklands, in the Gulf, in Yugoslavia and in
Afghanistan the costs have been remarkably low, but
when we authorise war we sanction action that may
result in the deaths of thousands or in injury to many
thousands of our own troops and citizens, but also to
the Iraqis, in this case, many or perhaps even most of
whom will be wholly innocent of blame.
If the concept of self-defence is to provide a moral
justification for the giving of such authority, the state
against which that military action is being taken must
either have embarked on an act of aggression or there
must be compelling evidence that such a state poses a
grave and imminent threat of aggression either within
its region, to its neighbours or to ourselves and our
friends and allies.
We had to fight the second world war because of the
German acts of aggression. The attack by what is now
North Korea justified the action in Korea. We were
right to use force in the Falklands, Kuwait and
Afghanistan. To use another example, had the United
States been aware of the Japanese carrier fleet sailing
towards Pearl Harbour a pre-emptive strike would
have been justified. Surely the nature of those
illustrations where self-defence was invoked indicates
how rare the cases really are. Surely we have to
adhere closely to the proposition that one can invoke
self-defence only when we face an act of aggression or
it seems likely that one is imminent. Here we have to
make a judgment and I am the first to admit that
judgments in this sphere are extraordinarily difficult.
Saddam, as the dossier makes plain, is an evil, wicked
man, an aggressor and a killer who has acquired
weapons of mass destruction and has no moral
inhibitions about using them. However, I do not think
that he is irrational. He must know, and I believe he
does know, and he must understand, and I believe
that he understands, the consequences to Iraq, himself
and his regime if he uses force against his neighbours
or the western alliance. Throughout the cold war we
based our security on the concept of deterrence.
Ultimately the Soviet Union collapsed. In this case, too,
we should base our security on a concept of
deterrence, not on a pre-emptive strike.
24 Sept 2002 : Column 51
I have two final points to make. First, in a democracy
public opinion will sustain a war only if the justification
for it is overwhelmingly clear?so clear that the public
will view the horror shown on their television screens
being done in their name and comment, "It has to be
done." I do not believe that public opinion will be
satisfied that war in Iraq is justified. To lead a country
into war without overwhelming public support seems
not just wrong, but profoundly dangerous.
Secondly?this point follows on from what the Father
of the House said and from what I have articulated
here previously?in a democracy no Government
should commit forces to war without the authority of
this House expressed on a substantive motion, so that
those who oppose war can seek to change the policy
by their vote. To commit Britain to war relying on the
royal prerogative and without the explicit authority of
this House seems to be an affront to democracy.
Jan 22 2003 ((((bikini Bottom)))) INFO: 323.683.5520
Event@: 7969 Santa Monic Blvd. HOllywood ca.
traktion.launchbase.com/images/bikinibottomhandbill.jpg
Anti-war train drivers refuse to move arms freight Kevin Maguire
Thursday January 9, 2003
The Guardian
Train drivers yesterday refused to move a freight train carrying ammunition believed to be destined for British forces being deployed in the Gulf.
Railway managers cancelled the Ministry of Defence service after the crewmen, described as "conscientious objectors" by a supporter, said they opposed Tony Blair's threat to attack Iraq.
The anti-war revolt is the first such industrial action by workers for decades.
The two Motherwell-based drivers declined to operate the train between the Glasgow area and the Glen Douglas base on Scotland's west coast, Europe's largest Nato weapons store.
English Welsh and Scottish Railway (EWS), which transports munitions for the MoD as well as commercial goods, yesterday attempted to persuade the drivers to move the disputed load by tomorrow.
Leaders of the Aslef rail union were pressed at a meeting with EWS executives to ask the drivers to relent. But the officials of a union opposed to any attack on Iraq are unlikely to comply.
The two drivers are understood to be the only pair at the Motherwell freight depot trained on the route of the West Highland Line.
An EWS spokesman declined to confirm the train had been halted, although he insisted no drivers had refused to take out the trains.
"We don't discuss commercial issues," he said.
"The point about the two drivers is untrue and we don't discuss issues about meetings we have."
Yet his claim was flatly contradicted by a well-placed rail industry source who supplied the Guardian with the train's reference number.
The MoD later said it had been informed by EWS that mechanical problems, caused by the cold winter weather, had resulted in the train's cancellation.
One solution under discussion yesterday between the MoD and EWS was to transport the shipment by road to avoid what rail managers hoped would be an isolated confrontation.
Dockers went on strike rather than load British-made arms on to ships destined for Chile after the assassination of leftwing leader Salvador Allende in 1973.
In 1920 stevedores on London's East India Docks refused to move guns on to the Jolly George, a ship chartered to take weapons to anti-Bolsheviks after the Russian revolution.
Trade unions supporting workers who refuse to handle weapons could risk legal action and possible fines for contempt of court.
Lindsey German, convener of the Stop the War Coalition, said: "We fully support the action that has been taken to impede an unjust and aggressive war. We hope that other people around the country will be able to do likewise."
The anti-war group is organising a second national demonstration in central London on Saturday February 15. Organisers claimed more than 400,000 people attended a protest in September.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,870967,00.html
babble are back! babble are back...yes thats right you heard correctly..
on friday january 17th @ the international arts , garden street leicester 9 til 2am ..we have Dan from the deep cartel[ exeter] frequenting the decks for us
and your all invited ...and the bonus is ..arrive before 10 and its free [£3 after] limited capacity so arrive early...also..."come-dancin'" each and every saturday night @ nomad , king street leicester 9pm til 2pm
with dj debs [babble] and mr rob[babble] + special guests . playing the best in underground house ...
:p
Mount Ravemore…..feb 16th 2003 whats up people just want to give you all a heads up!! next event by sympty will be presidents day weekend.sunday feb. 16th 2003. no work or schol the next day. keep your eyes peeled for full details soon.
dirty circus, is it fatal? I cannot be the only person who feels deep sadness at the loss of dirty circus.
Judging by the amount of views for our one topic that isnt interesting id say theres a lot of you roaming the net.
I know you cant post anonomously on this, but it might help to ease the pain by allowing you to talk mindless bollox to one another.
Feel free to use this as the dirty circus anxiety syndrome message board.
Much luv
Fixio
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.
