Facebook Fuck Ups - Party Vibe

Welcome To

Facebook Fuck Ups

This topic is empty.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

Author

Posts
October 24, 2008 at 3:09 pm

#694586
1

process

@process

Member
Quote:

An Oz call centre employee has become an overnight net celeb down under after an email exchange between him and his firm’s workforce manager regarding a “sickie” escaped into the wild yesterday.

The correspondence, currently doing the rounds of Aussie inboxes, concerns a day’s leave of absence claimed by Kyle Doyle on 21 August. Read on…

—

From: Niresh Regmi
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 9:35 a.m.
To: Kyle Doyle
Subject: Absence on Thursday 21st 2008

Hi Kyle,

Please provide a medical certificate stating a valid reason for your sick leave on

Thursday 21st 2008.

Thank You

NIRESH REGMI

Real Time Manager, Workforce Operations

—

From: Kyle Doyle
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 9:38 a.m.
To: Niresh Regmi
Subject: RE: Absence on Thursday 21st 2008

Niresh,

1 day leave absences do not require a medical certificate as stated in my contract, provided I have stated that I am on leave for medical reasons.

Thanks

Regards,

Kyle Doyle

Resolutions Expert – Technical

—

From: Niresh Regmi
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 9:39 a.m.
To: Kyle Doyle
Subject: RE: Absence on Thursday 21st 2008

Hi Kyle,

Usually that is the case, as per your contract. However please note that leave during these occasions is only granted for genuine medical reasons. You line manager has determined that your leave was not due to medical reasons and as such we cannot grant leave on this occasion.

NIRESH REGMI

—

From: Kyle Doyle
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 9:43 a.m.
To: Niresh Regmi
Subject: RE: Absence on Thursday 21st 2008

Hi Niresh,

My leave was due to medical reasons, so you cannot deny leave based on a line manager’s discretion, with no proof, please process leave as requested.

Thanks

Regards,

Kyle Doyle

—

From: Niresh Regmi
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 9:50 a.m.
To: Kyle Doyle
Subject: RE: Absence on Thursday 21st 2008

Hi Kyle,

I believe the proof that you are after is below

Brilliant. To his credit, the busted Doyle concludes:

—

From: Kyle Doyle
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2008 9:55 a.m.
To: Niresh Regmi
Subject: RE: Absence on Thursday 21st 2008

HAHAHA LMAO epic fail

No worries man

Regards,

Kyle Doyle

Skiving Aussie fingered on Facebook ? The Register

Ha ha ha :laugh_at:
October 24, 2008 at 3:55 pm

#911613
1

Tank Girl

@tank-girl

Member
silly boy :laugh_at::laugh_at:
October 25, 2008 at 12:57 am

#911611
1

Raj

@raj

Member
oooooops:laugh_at:
October 28, 2008 at 8:04 pm

#911616
1

...

@

Member
haha, what a tool.
October 28, 2008 at 8:47 pm

#911606
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Mrs Bunsen forwarded that to me on Friday…

:laugh_at:
October 29, 2008 at 8:54 am

#911615
1

damo666

@damo666

Member
execellent
October 29, 2008 at 7:20 pm

#911610
1

Big Bang

@big-bang

Member
haha,and i bet he’s well happy its all over the net now and nobody will ever trust him again when hes sick. I especially like the wording of his last mail reply…obviosly no point trying to bullshit anymore and get out of that one!

‘HAHAHA LMAO epic fail
No worries man
Regards,
Kyle Doyle’

:laugh_at::laugh_at::laugh_at:
October 30, 2008 at 1:12 am

#911614
1

cheeseweasel

@cheeseweasel

Participant
I’ve just deleted my facebook after realising that their privacy policy is a crock of shit. (Though I’m sure they still have all my info on record somewhere)
October 30, 2008 at 8:00 pm

#911612
1

Raj

@raj

Member
Their privacy policy – what privacy???
October 31, 2008 at 7:47 pm

#911607
6

General Lighting

@general-lighting

Moderator
Staff
and there’s more..:laugh_at:

Virgin sacks 13 over Facebook use – Yahoo! News UK
October 31, 2008 at 11:08 pm

#911617
1

DaftFader

@daftfader

Participant
General Lighting;242301 wrote:

and there’s more..:laugh_at:

Virgin sacks 13 over Facebook use – Yahoo! News UK

looks like there just tring to make an example of them imo
October 31, 2008 at 11:24 pm

#911608
6

General Lighting

@general-lighting

Moderator
Staff
DaftFader;242321 wrote:

looks like there just tring to make an example of them imo

and why not? they don’t have the right to slag off their employers and their paying customers like that (and to be fair Virgin didn’t even say it was wrong for their employers to use facebook, only that they should use it in a appropriate manner)
November 1, 2008 at 4:36 am

#911618
1

DaftFader

@daftfader

Participant
General Lighting;242323 wrote:

and why not? they don’t have the right to slag off their employers and their paying customers like that (and to be fair Virgin didn’t even say it was wrong for their employers to use facebook, only that they should use it in a appropriate manner)

the thing i am getting at is that no matter how privet you think you life is .. or how privet it is … and i know you keep talking about invasion of privesy … one so called fun “right to life” gets shat on by some cunt willing to make a mockery of you by means like facebook or myspace or any other social network/forum …. can/will/may cause damage to your forthcoming rep .. as it were … so shit like that can be classed as sladerous … not that i don’t think peopl deserve it .. just that there are about 100000 other people doing the same shit … just the poor fuckers that get caught getting named and shamed for it …
November 1, 2008 at 5:53 am

#911609
6

General Lighting

@general-lighting

Moderator
Staff
DaftFader;242344 wrote:

not that i don’t think peopl deserve it .. just that there are about 100000 other people doing the same shit … just the poor fuckers that get caught getting named and shamed for it …

they slagged off their employers/customers on parts of that site clearly accessible by other members of the public! If they were bitching about the customers in the staff room at Heathrow or wherever they were based they would have got away with it.

there is no such thing as privacy online, anyone determined enough can find info on you these days.

I worked out a few days that if someone had my real name and a small bit of knowledge about my specialist technical skills, it would take a few google searches to trace me to here – and all this despite me only occasionally mentioning my first name on here…. And all this despite my name literally being mixed up with “10 000 Chinamen”, at least 3 of whom specialise in exactly the things as I do (albeit not in England!)

Therefore, if I do ever post about work it does not give details and is either positive stuff and relatively non-controversial info about the technology I use at work..
November 1, 2008 at 2:02 pm

#911619
1

DaftFader

@daftfader

Participant
General Lighting;242347 wrote:

they slagged off their employers/customers on parts of that site clearly accessible by other members of the public! If they were bitching about the customers in the staff room at Heathrow or wherever they were based they would have got away with it.

there is no such thing as privacy online, anyone determined enough can find info on you these days.

I worked out a few days that if someone had my real name and a small bit of knowledge about my specialist technical skills, it would take a few google searches to trace me to here – and all this despite me only occasionally mentioning my first name on here…. And all this despite my name literally being mixed up with “10 000 Chinamen”, at least 3 of whom specialise in exactly the things as I do (albeit not in England!)

Therefore, if I do ever post about work it does not give details and is either positive stuff and relatively non-controversial info about the technology I use at work..

yeah i was thinking about that the other day … i fucked up and gave a few ppl at work the link to my radio show a while back without thinking … luckerly i don’t think they looked at the forums as i would probably be out of a job a while ago … but it is risky … shows that you do need to be carefull … thing is … swim could make stuff up on the internet as it is annonmus and if the people that saw the stuff that swim wrough under a diferent alias it would be hard to prove that it was them …:laugh_at:
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.