everytime i see something really interesting, there’s always really angry reviews about it, sometimes from seemingly trustable sites… what i find strange is their disambiguation (best word i can think of) seems to be a mixture of arguments generated through semantic multiplicity (which is always a sign of trouble) and lack of evidence, as well as subjective mockery seemingly to add weight/ force… i have no idea whether many of the suggestions are true (and thats all they are, they are very much ‘make your own mind up)… but the more i become interested in self awareness, the more i realise that although i’m a graduate, adult for many years now, i don’t know a lot about many things. why?… well its simple. things are cushy enough, and i didn’t want that to be disrupted by self question. will a dog question the owner that feeds them and keeps it under a roof as long as she/he doesn’t poo all over the place?… no, of course not. am a dog?… thats a tougher question tbh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEV5AFFcZ-s
here’s no.2 thrive
