Washington, DC voters approved Initiative 81 am I correct ?
- This topic is empty.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Am i correct that as this is written ayahuasca will be okay but pure DMT is not likewise 4-PO-DMT will still potentially carry absurd penalties yet any dodgy as fuck mushroom with unknown chemistry is fine as long as one constituent can be analyzed chemically and confirmed to contain the molecule that’s still illegal (4-PO-DMT)???
Maybe by some astonishing chance shrooms containing 4-PO-DMT are somehow unable to also produce deadly as fuck organic compounds and so every psilocybe is guaranteed safe , but i doubt it.
This is madness, it’s a step in the right direction but it’s dumb as fuck. what if someone cultivated shrooms containing 4-AC0-5-MEO-DMT? Would they be okay ?
If this actually is correct then you have a plant that contains trace amounts of mescaline but also trace amounts of meth and PMA and while it’s not conclusive it’s not outside the realms of possibility and then wtf happens ? You know for a fact the DEA will gladly still push for 50 years for trace meth…..
4-HO-5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine, not 5-MEO-4-ACO-DMT as i said .
Please consider making a donation using the means of your choice. Our station relies heavily on listener contributions to survive. As such your support is greatly appreciated.
Paypal: - paypal.me